| 1. Please enter your minimum details below (sex, location and profession). You DO NOT have to include your email address. If you do, it will be kept fully confidential and only ever be used to possibly follow up on any interesting comments or suggestions you may make in this survey. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 67 | ||
| skipped question | 0 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Sex | 100.0% | 67 | |
| City/Region | 100.0% | 67 | |
| Profession | 100.0% | 67 | |
| Email Address: | 67.2% | 45 | |
| 2. Do you agree with the statement that the ONLY way public corruption can be reduced and transparency and accountability increased is if ordinary people somehow get involved and stay involved? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 63 | ||
| skipped question | 4 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Yes | 88.9% | 56 | |
| No | 7.9% | 5 | |
| Not sure | 3.2% | 2 | |
| 3. The Philippine Public Transparency Reporting Project was built on the belief that the more ordinary citizens can understand and access information about public sector behavior and finances at national and local levels, the more we can monitor and ultimately participate in decisions on public spending and help improve accountability and reduce corruption: Was our assumption correct? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 61 | ||
| skipped question | 6 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Yes | 98.4% | 60 | |
| No | 0.0% | 0 | |
| Not sure | 1.6% | 1 | |
| 4. Do you think the project purpose was clear? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 60 | ||
| skipped question | 7 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Yes | 88.3% | 53 | |
| No | 3.3% | 2 | |
| Not sure | 8.3% | 5 | |
| 5. Given the size of the challenge and the length of our project (the website was launched in March 2010), how successful do you think we were? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 60 | ||
| skipped question | 7 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Very successful | 16.7% | 10 | |
| Quite successful | 60.0% | 36 | |
| Not very succesful | 16.7% | 10 | |
| Not sure | 6.7% | 4 | |
| Other (please specify) | 9 | ||
| 6. Do you think the website (www.transparencyreporting.net), was an important part of the project? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 57 | ||
| skipped question | 10 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Yes | 98.2% | 56 | |
| No | 0.0% | 0 | |
| Don't know | 1.8% | 1 | |
| 7. Do you think the project was well conceived and designed | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 61 | ||
| skipped question | 6 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Yes | 78.7% | 48 | |
| No | 4.9% | 3 | |
| Not sure | 16.4% | 10 | |
| 8. Do you think it was a good idea to try build and link wider constituencies for change that brought together media, civil society organisations, faith and other groups and individuals to organise and press for change? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 61 | ||
| skipped question | 6 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Yes | 100.0% | 61 | |
| No | 0.0% | 0 | |
| Not sure | 0.0% | 0 | |
| 9. What was your main project participation (choose one answer only)? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 61 | ||
| skipped question | 6 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| As a participant in one or both of the training workshops | 60.7% | 37 | |
| As a member/supporter of the local citizens' accountability group | 19.7% | 12 | |
| As a participant in a project roundtable or other public event | 3.3% | 2 | |
| As a writer who contributed stories to the project website | 11.5% | 7 | |
| As somebody who contacted us via email or website with a question, comment, suggestion or tip-off | 4.9% | 3 | |
| Other (please specify) | 3 | ||
| 10. What did you think of the training workshop(s) you attended? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 38 | ||
| skipped question | 29 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Very useful and interesting | 76.3% | 29 | |
| Quite useful and interesting | 21.1% | 8 | |
| Not very useful or interesting | 2.6% | 1 | |
| Other (please specify) | 2 | ||
| 11. What is your opinion on setting up local citizens' accountability groups to try and help build greater transparency and accountability at the local government level? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 12 | ||
| skipped question | 55 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| It is a good idea in both theory and practise | 58.3% | 7 | |
| It is a good idea in theory -but in my experience it doesn't work in practise | 16.7% | 2 | |
| It is too early to say | 25.0% | 3 | |
| 12. Have you been able to put any new skills or learning you got from the training(s) into actual use? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 37 | ||
| skipped question | 30 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Yes | 78.4% | 29 | |
| No | 21.6% | 8 | |
| 13. Outside of this project, have you received any other training around the issues of corruption, transparency and accountability? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 38 | ||
| skipped question | 29 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Yes | 63.2% | 24 | |
| No | 36.8% | 14 | |
| 14. How do you rate the training offered by this project in comparison with other training you had on corruption, transparency and accountability? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 24 | ||
| skipped question | 43 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| The training from this project was better | 37.5% | 9 | |
| The training from this project was worse | 0.0% | 0 | |
| They were about the same | 62.5% | 15 | |
| I can't remember | 0.0% | 0 | |
| 15. Do you think your local citizen's accountability group will be able to continue on its own after this project ends on August 31 and financial and all other support finishes? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 12 | ||
| skipped question | 55 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Yes I think so | 50.0% | 6 | |
| No, I don't think so | 8.3% | 1 | |
| Not sure | 41.7% | 5 | |
| 16. How interesting/useful did you find the project roundtable(s)/events you attended compared with other projects that also covefred issues around corruption, transparency and accountability? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 3 | ||
| skipped question | 64 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| This project's roundtable(s)/events I attended were better | 33.3% | 1 | |
| This project's roundtable(s)/events I attended were worse | 0.0% | 0 | |
| They were about the same | 66.7% | 2 | |
| I can't remember | 0.0% | 0 | |
| 17. What did you think about your experience of writng for the project website? (You may tick more than one answer). | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 7 | ||
| skipped question | 60 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| I enjoyed the whole commissioning and editing process - from the initial idea through to publication | 57.1% | 4 | |
| I got to write about something that would have proved hard to get published elsewhere | 42.9% | 3 | |
| It was a good learning experience | 42.9% | 3 | |
| The editing of my story was too much and too heavy | 0.0% | 0 | |
| I didn't understand why there were so many changes made to my story | 0.0% | 0 | |
| I wasn't happy that the editors asked me too many questions before it was finally published | 14.3% | 1 | |
| I would like to keep writing for the project website given the chance | 85.7% | 6 | |
| 18. How did you find out about/come across this project (the Philippine Public Transparency Reporting Project/Pera Natin To!) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 10 | ||
| skipped question | 57 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Through reports/mentions about it in the Philippine media | 30.0% | 3 | |
| By accident, through the Internet | 10.0% | 1 | |
| Through friends or colleagues | 50.0% | 5 | |
| I already knew about the project because of its trainings/roundtables | 20.0% | 2 | |
| Other (please specify) | 0 | ||
| 19. From your own experience, please rate the project in terms of: | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 59 | |||||||
| skipped question | 8 | |||||||
| Excellent | Very good | Good | Average | Poor | Rating Average | Response Count | ||
| Information and education | 32.2% (19) | 45.8% (27) | 13.6% (8) | 5.1% (3) | 3.4% (2) | 0.0% (0) | 2.02 | 59 |
| Reporting | 28.8% (17) | 40.7% (24) | 25.4% (15) | 5.1% (3) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 2.07 | 59 |
| Training | 24.1% (14) | 48.3% (28) | 22.4% (13) | 5.2% (3) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 2.09 | 58 |
| Advocacy and campaigns | 24.6% (14) | 49.1% (28) | 21.1% (12) | 5.3% (3) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 2.07 | 57 |
| Project website design and appeal | 30.4% (17) | 44.6% (25) | 16.1% (9) | 5.4% (3) | 0.0% (0) | 3.6% (2) | 2.11 | 56 |
| Focusing equally at both national and the local level | 24.6% (14) | 45.6% (26) | 22.8% (13) | 5.3% (3) | 1.8% (1) | 0.0% (0) | 2.14 | 57 |
| 20. Do you think the project achieved anything of interest or made any kind of difference? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 59 | ||
| skipped question | 8 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Yes | 93.2% | 55 | |
| No | 1.7% | 1 | |
| Not sure | 5.1% | 3 | |
| 21. Please explain what impact you think it made or what you believe it achieved | ||
|---|---|---|
| answered question | 50 | |
| skipped question | 17 | |
| Response Count | ||
| 50 | ||
| 22. Please use this box for any comments, thoughts or ideas you may have | ||
|---|---|---|
| answered question | 42 | |
| skipped question | 25 | |
| Response Count | ||
| 42 | ||